Article: Medical paternalism and the fetus

The relationship between a pregnant mother considering a termination and the doctor should be an expert-expert one

In 2001 I published an academic article on the ethics of abortion in the Journal of Medical Ethics.

Abstract

A number of developments in the medical field have changed the debate about the ethics of abortion. These developments include: advances in fetal physiology, the increase in neonatal intensive care and the survival rates of premature infants. This paper discusses the idea of selective termination and the effects that these decisions have on disabled people of today. It presents a critique of the counselling services that are provided for the parents of a disabled fetus and discusses how this is viewed from a social perspective. The article ends with an argument that the mother deserves to be autonomous in the decision of abortion. The easiest and most fair way to develop her autonomy is to consider the relationship between a professional and a mother as an expert–expert relationship. Here both parties are considered experts in diagnostic information, treatment options, possibilities, and their history, family roots, philosophy and way of life, respectively.

Click here to read the full article or click here to download a PDF.

Leave a Reply

Tags
Most read posts
Doubts over the brain scans, the end of ‘doctor knows best’, sucked into the culture wars and protective power of attorney
Recent posts
Should Christians use homeopathic medicine and why are climate scientists self-censoring in academic journal articles?
There is always a danger of old fogeys starting to pontificate about 'the young', but I have been fascinated reading into the research and study done on Gen Z
How are young people different to those who came before, and what can we learn from them?
The Brethren’s suspicion of the ‘world’, an explosion of joy, Eric Liddell’s sprinting epiphany, and celebrating beauty
The science of the billions-of-years-old Earth, has God deceived us, and are philosophers so useless after all?