Article: Medical paternalism and the fetus

The relationship between a pregnant mother considering a termination and the doctor should be an expert-expert one

In 2001 I published an academic article on the ethics of abortion in the Journal of Medical Ethics.

Abstract

A number of developments in the medical field have changed the debate about the ethics of abortion. These developments include: advances in fetal physiology, the increase in neonatal intensive care and the survival rates of premature infants. This paper discusses the idea of selective termination and the effects that these decisions have on disabled people of today. It presents a critique of the counselling services that are provided for the parents of a disabled fetus and discusses how this is viewed from a social perspective. The article ends with an argument that the mother deserves to be autonomous in the decision of abortion. The easiest and most fair way to develop her autonomy is to consider the relationship between a professional and a mother as an expert–expert relationship. Here both parties are considered experts in diagnostic information, treatment options, possibilities, and their history, family roots, philosophy and way of life, respectively.

Click here to read the full article or click here to download a PDF.

Leave a Reply

Tags
Most read posts
What can we learn from how the early church lived out their faith during their own pandemics?
How are young people different to those who came before, and what can we learn from them?
Navigating the transitions of later life
Living faithfully as we approach retirement, dependence, dementia and death
This Bill is the wrong approach - there is a better way to give individuals and their families dignity at the end of life
Recent posts
The campaign, the debate, the result, and how the church can respond
Considering the growing wave of opposition to birth control
Do not be taken in by misleading platitudes by the pro-euthanasia lobby
This Bill is the wrong approach - there is a better way to give individuals and their families dignity at the end of life