Neo-Luddism and the ‘myth’ of progress: Should Christians be pro or anti technology?

Can we hold some tech at arms-length while simultaneously seeing other products of Silicon Valley as God's beneficence?

In recent weeks we have discussed how to keep modern technology at arms-length (smartphones in the home) and our excitement at how humans may be about to untap God’s blessing in creation through technology (the solar energy revolution). Today we ask the question: can we really hold these positions simultaneously? Can we be neo-Luddites when it comes to smartphones and yet boosters when it comes to solar panels? What should an authentically Christian posture to technology be? Generally positive, cautiously hostile, or is it all just a neutral tool to be used for good or ill depending on who is using it? Is humanity accelerating – thanks to our modern mastery of creation – towards God’s ultimate plan to reconcile all things, or is ‘progress’ little more than a pseudo-Christian comforting myth we tell ourselves?

Listen to other episodes of Matters of Life and Death or find us on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Pocket Casts, Google Podcasts, Podcast Addict, Castbox or whatever app you use to subscribe and receive new episodes sent straight to your device.

Tags
Most read posts
What can we learn from how the early church lived out their faith during their own pandemics?
How are young people different to those who came before, and what can we learn from them?
Navigating the transitions of later life
This Bill is the wrong approach - there is a better way to give individuals and their families dignity at the end of life
Living faithfully as we approach retirement, dependence, dementia and death
Recent posts
Expressive individualism meets simulated personhood
These verses act for many pro-life Christians as the cornerstone of their theology
There's been a rash of reports that people who spend too long with ChatGPT are ending up mentally ill, or even suicidal
The ethics of why some religious groups (let alone swathes of Americans) cut their sons' foreskins off are surprisingly complicated
Theological and medical responses to assisted dying